Janine asks if Winston is still paying rent on Ray’s occult book shop. It then becomes clear that she’s visiting Winston Zeddemore, the former ghostbuster who has gone on to great wealth and power in the private sector.
She’s in an expensive-looking office building. She’s flipping the coin over in her hand. She also gets one of the movie’s best lines.)įrom there, we cut to Janine here and now. (Potts briefly shows up earlier in “Ghostbusters: Afterlife,” assisting Spengler’s family as they move into his rickety old farmhouse.
It’s a cute scene and aligns with the first movie’s subtle implication that there is some romantic chemistry between Spengler and Janine. She’s giving him a small medallion from the 1964-65 World’s Fair. Annie Potts’ Janine Melnitz is standing outside the building talking to Harold Ramis’ Egon Spengler. It seems to be from right before the team enters Dana’s building for their final confrontation with Gozer. Firstly, a short deleted sequence is played from the original film. The post-credits sequence is a little more interesting. Finally, after some playful romantic banter, Murray admits that he marked the cards ahead of time so he could easily identify them. The combination of seeing her name, the surprise of seeing her name and then her appearing, is absolutely wonderful and speaks to the general nostalgia-mining good vibes of “Ghostbusters: Afterlife.” She asks Murray to identify the symbol on the opposite side of the card and he keeps getting them right! He admits that he used to just shock the male test subject while hitting on the female subject (which causes Sigourney to give him a little jolt). Well, that is answered immediately, as it cuts to her giving Bill Murray the same psychic power test that you see him giving a couple of young college students in the first film. Sigourney Weaver wasn’t in “Ghostbusters: Afterlife.” What is the meaning of this? The last credit in the sequence is “And Sigourney Weaver.” But wait. Seriously – turn back now! How the Mid-Credits Scene Answers a Burning Original Ghostbusters Questionīefore the mid- and post-credits scenes start, we are treated to a fabulous credits sequence by the geniuses at Filmograph (who recently did the titles for the “Candyman” remake and Amazon’s great “The Underground Railroad” series). Massive spoilers for “Ghostbusters: Afterlife” follow. So let’s dig into the “Ghostbusters: Afterlife” credits sequences – what they are, what they mean and what they could be leading toward. And “Ghostbusters: Afterlife” looks to do the same. To that end, “Ghostbusters: Afterlife” has adopted one of the quirkier aspects of today’s mega-movies: the mid- and post-credits sequences.Įmployed most memorably by Marvel Studios, which introduced the practice on its very first movie, 2008’s “Iron Man,” it has come to be deployed in various scenarios, all with the singular goal of expanding the world and introducing concepts, ideas or characters that could be expanded upon in subsequent installments of the franchise. Notably, it’s looking to do all these things within the context of modern, big-budget blockbusters, which lean on vast, interconnected networks of shared mythology to give audiences more bang for their buck. Whatever comes out of it, I’d love to see Winston connected to it.“Ghostbusters: Afterlife” looks to do many things: tell a charming and complex story of family dynamics offer up the same mixture of scares and comedy that made the first film such a smash and introduce new viewers to the wacky world of proton packs and ghost traps. He’s almost like Sam Jackson’s character in the Marvel Universe.
#Ghostbusters afterlife credits scene movie
"Clearly, it’s a new family’s movie so I don’t know if any of the old Ghostbusters can be major players - but being involved as mentors in some way would be a lot of fun. He understands the Ghostbusters better than anyone. He also mentions the 2016 reboot, which he cameoed in along Murray and Aykroyd, citing the film's failure on being a reboot and not a continuation of the established canon. He also talks about the character's legacy, how his role was reduced in the first film's script, and how the wide success of the film allowed him to make a name for himself in other works such as The Crow and Oz. Hudson, in an interview with Yahoo! Movies, discusses his cameo in the new film, where it's revealed that his character has amassed large amounts of wealth and uses it to maintain Ghostbuster properties. Related: Ghostbusters: Every Apocalypse In Afterlife Explained (Were They Real?)
0 kommentar(er)
